好色tv

A caller identified as Harvey said the panel鈥檚 online survey, launched almost a month ago, and an impromptu survey it ran during Monday鈥檚 town hall, were designed to deliver a predetermined outcome.

鈥淣owhere in those questions were we allowed just to say flat 鈥榃e disagree with this (leaving CPP),鈥欌�� said Harvey, who added he does not favour quitting the federal nest-egg fund.

鈥淭here seems to be an unwillingness on the part of the of the people who are presenting this idea (that) they don't want to be told 鈥榃e don鈥檛 want this.鈥欌��

Dinning told Harvey the surveys are purposely designed to not ask Albertans whether they want to quit CPP because that would be premature.

鈥淩ather than pop the question too early, the purpose of these town hall meetings is to hear from Albertans, hear their concerns (about an Alberta plan), so that we can make note of that for the government, so ultimately they will be obliged to address them."

Dinning reiterated Premier Danielle Smith鈥檚 government won鈥檛 leave CPP without putting the question to voters.

鈥淵ou're going to get your say,鈥� Dinning told Harvey.

鈥淭his will go to a referendum. The government has said as much.鈥�

The panel took questions from residents in northern Alberta for more than 90 minutes. It鈥檚 the first of five regional telephone halls scheduled to run over the next six weeks.

Callers sought answers on how an Alberta stand-alone pension would handle the issue of portability, death benefit issues, disability issues, de-indexing, management structure and management investment mandate.

One caller asked how Old Age Security factored in.

Would the fund maximize returns or would it become a government slush fund to invest in boutique programs or oil and gas ventures, another queried.

Still others wondered what would happen if more people move to the province to take advantage of an Alberta pension plan, or what would occur if demographics shift and Alberta鈥檚 young population paying into a pension plan becomes an older one taking money out.

鈥淚'm undecided because I don't have enough information. And we need to know the information before you ever go to a referendum,鈥� said a caller named Ed.

鈥淲e need to know how much money you need to get. We need to know what the premiums will be, what the returns will be in intimate detail.

鈥淪o coming out now with this type of forum, without the detailed information, I think it's very premature and inappropriate.鈥�

Ed also called the panel out for its survey questions that don鈥檛 allow respondents to say whether or not they even want to go down the path of a stand-alone pension plan.

鈥淥nly allowing us to select one answer, I think that was inappropriate,鈥� he said.

Dinning said the panel doesn鈥檛 have answers for detailed questions, but said any stand-alone provincial pension by law must provide equal or better benefits.

鈥淭hat鈥檚 the law that the government would have to and would be obliged to support,鈥� he said.

The government said it took 37 calls and comments, with 10,000 people online or on the phone at one point.

The discussions are based on a report commissioned by the government and completed by pension analyst LifeWorks. It was released by Smith on Sept. 21 to launch the debate.

The LifeWorks findings are critical to the province鈥檚 claim that a stand-alone Alberta plan is workable. To make it work, says LifeWorks, an Alberta plan needs 鈥� and is entitled to 鈥� more than half of the $575 billion in the CPP fund.

Some callers questioned the math and how a province with 12 per cent of Canada鈥檚 population deserves 53 per cent of the pension fund. One caller suggested Alberta should get a second opinion.

鈥淭he only actuarial study that鈥檚 been done is the one that the government has released. Clearly there will be negotiations,鈥� said Dinning.

Dinning鈥檚 panel is to report back in the spring on whether there is a public appetite for a stand-alone pension plan. If so, Smith says she will call a referendum, with a majority vote needed to leave CPP.

This report by 好色tvwas first published Oct. 16, 2023.