ºÃÉ«tv

Speaking to reporters on his way into a Liberal caucus meeting, Liberal MP Patrick Weiler said Canada has a "a pretty clear stance" on moving away from inefficient fossil fuel subsidies and extending tax credits to enhanced oil recovery is a "step in the wrong direction."

"I think that's a really important thing that the prime minister will have to answer about," Weiler said.

Enhanced oil recovery is a carbon storage technology that captures carbon dioxide from industrial emitters and injects it underground at oilfields. That increases pressure and pushes more oil out of the rock, while the carbon dioxide is trapped underground.

Environmentalists see the extension of the tax credits to enhanced oil recovery as a direct subsidy of oil production, while the industry says tax measures are not subsidies.

The section of the budget addressing tax credits for carbon capture utilization and storage, often abbreviated as CCUS, said enhanced oil recovery would not be eligible for a federal tax credit.

But the deal with Alberta commits Canada to extending federal tax credits to encourage large-scale CCUS investments, including the Pathways Alliance project, as well as "enhanced oil recovery in order to provide the certainty needed to attract large additional sources of domestic and foreign capital."

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said she had heard rumours that the government was going to reverse its budget commitment on enhanced oil recovery, which initially kept her from supporting the budget.

As ºÃÉ«tvreported last week, then-cabinet minister Steven Guilbeault was dispatched to win May's vote for the budget last month, having received assurances from Carney's office that tax credits for enhanced oil recovery would not be in the budget or added to it afterwards.

May told ºÃÉ«tvlast week the flip-flop amounted to a "significant betrayal" and she now questions Carney's word going forward.

Carney did not stop to take questions from reporters Wednesday, either before or after the caucus meeting or as he entered the House of Commons.

Neither Energy and Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson nor Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin would answer questions about the tax credit.

Hodgson told ºÃÉ«tvthe day the pipeline deal was signed that extending the tax credits to enhanced oil recovery was important to Alberta.

Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne told reporters Wednesday he would get back with an answer on why the government contradicted the budget in the Alberta deal.

"I think what you've found in the budget is that there's a number of tax credits. I would say that we're probably, in the G7, the country which has offered the most competitive tax environment for clean technology when it comes to natural resources," he said.

"I would say that Canada is well positioned to be a responsible and also a sustainable producer of natural resources."

Not all Liberal MPs seemed concerned about the change of direction Wednesday.

Thunder Bay MP Marcus Powlowski said the government should have the flexibility to adjust the policy stances it presents in the budget.

Toronto Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, meanwhile, said enhanced oil recovery is an unproven method and he would have more to say about it soon.

This report by ºÃÉ«tvwas first published Dec. 3, 2025.