ºÃÉ«tv

Arévalo is scheduled to take office on Jan. 14, and it was unclear whether the prosecutors' continued targeting of him and his party could interfere with the inauguration.

The most recent request from prosecutors cites alleged irregularities in the way Arévalo's Seed Movement party gathered signatures to register years earlier, something previously raised by prosecutors just before electoral authorities confirmed Arévalo's spot in the runoff after a first round of voting.

At a news conference Friday, prosecutors said there were alleged irregularities in some precinct vote tallies that could lead to the election results being annulled.

Rafael Curruchiche, special prosecutor against impunity, said the Supreme Electoral Tribunal would have to resolve the situation. “All of the political parties and all of the candidates in all of the elections were affected here,� he said.

The Supreme Electoral Tribunal responded almost immediately that the election results were inalterable.

“The results are valid, certified, and the people (who won their races) are necessarily accredited and must take office Jan. 14. If not, it would be a rupture of the constitutional order,� tribunal President Blanca Alfaro said.

Authorities arrested a number of Seed Movement members in recent weeks. They previously requested stripping Arévalo of immunity over alleged mishandling of party funds and for allegedly making supportive comments on social media about the takeover of a public university last year.

The OAS in a statement said it “condemns the coup attempt by Guatemalan prosecutors� and urged Guatemala's courts and congress not to allow it.

“The attempt to nullify this year's general elections represents the worst form of breaking with democracy and consolidating a political fraud against the will of the people,� the OAS wrote.

Attorney General Consuelo Porras, who has been sanctioned by the U.S. government, has faced months of protests and calls for her resignation as well as international condemnation for her office’s interference. Porras, as well as outgoing , have denied any intent to meddle in the election results.

Earlier this month, four magistrates of Guatemala’s Supreme Electoral Tribunal hours after the Congress opened them up to prosecution by stripping them of their immunity as the losing side in the presidential election continued its efforts to interfere with the results.

The magistrates certified the election result but came under pressure from two attorneys tied to a far-right candidate who did not advance to the runoff round of the presidential election.

The lawyers contended that the tribunal overpaid for software purchased to carry out and publish rapid initial vote tallies. The Attorney General’s Office had previously said that its preliminary investigation suggested there had been less expensive options available.

Arévalo had not been polling among the top candidates headed into the first round of voting in June, but secured the second spot in the runoff with his promise to crack down on Guatemala’s endemic corruption. In the final vote in August, he won by a wide margin over former first lady Sandra Torres.

The son of a former president, Arévalo managed to position himself as an outsider. , he was untainted by the corruption that has pervaded Guatemalan politics in recent years and offered a promise of change.

Guatemala’s establishment, which would potentially have the most to fear from an Arévalo administration serious about taking on corruption, appears clearly bent on either weakening Arévalo or preventing from taking office.

In testimony to the special committee investigating the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, Karen Fisher, one of the attorneys who brought the complaint, urged them to move quickly. “Time is short because Jan. 14 is coming up,� she said.

___

Follow AP’s coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at