With college athletics bracing for the expected approval of a $2.8 billion NCAA antitrust settlement, the University of Kentucky is believed to be the first school to convert its athletic department to a limited-liability holding company.
The creation of Champions Blue LLC, approved last week by the university's Board of Trustees, is seen as a way for Kentucky to become more nimble in finding new revenue. The pending settlement in the House case will clear the way for schools to share up to $20.5 million annually with their athletes, but name, image and likeness deals on top of that are seen as a key asset in landing and keeping elite recruits 鈥 and that takes money.
The plan calls for a board that will have wide experience in fundraising, and the school noted it hopes to 鈥渦nlock new revenue streams through public-private partnerships and potentially other transactions, such as real estate.鈥
鈥淭here are so many benefits to creating Champions Blue,鈥 said Jacob Most, UK's director of strategic communications. 鈥淚t provides the flexibility needed to help us stay well-positioned during this period of continued evolution in college athletics. We will benefit from a new board of internal and outside experts with sports business experience 鈥 including in pro sports 鈥 that will help guide us in finding revenue streams to support our teams.鈥
The so-called House settlement and changing landscape were driving factors in the decision, and UK said in its Friday that the changes 鈥渨ill add millions more each year to the expenses of intercollegiate programs.鈥
An LLC provides some legal protections against losses or risks, and experts said transitioning to one may be a wise choice for major institutions like Kentucky. Being able to make quicker choices in the current landscape could be a key benefit.
It might not work across the board, however.
Making the shift requires thoughtful consideration, said Jim Booz, a former deputy athletic director at Virginia Tech and now the director of college athletics advisory services at the accounting firm James Moore & Co.
鈥淚t鈥檚 important for every institution to really think about their strategic alignment and what it is that they want to accomplish in this new landscape of college athletics,鈥 Booz said. 鈥淐ertainly, a move like this one allows the University of Kentucky to be a little bit more agile and nimble in executing, in all likelihood, some strategies that they plan to implement post the House case.鈥
Helen Drew, a sports law professor at the University of Buffalo, said agility is increasingly valuable in college athletics. As the amateur model vanishes, athletic departments are more inclined to make changes.
鈥淭he traditional structure has never fit particularly well, and certainly now it does not fit well at all with the transactional nature of college sports,鈥 Drew said. 鈥淭his is the first institution to acknowledge that we鈥檙e in a different era and that the organizational structures that we鈥檝e used up until this time don鈥檛 work well with the new reality.鈥
UK officials said the structure is appealing to all parties, including athletes seeking NIL compensation.
鈥淭his structure will help us create new revenue streams, which when reinvested in our programs and facilities, will help ensure the continued success of our sports programs,鈥 Most said. 鈥淚n today鈥檚 college landscape, isolating the business component enables us to focus on our student-athletes.鈥
___
AP sports:
