ºÃÉ«tv

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Rachel Krause found that the failures to comply with the records law “were intentional, not done in good faith, and were substantially groundless and vexatious.� Because Willis and her office “lacked substantial justification� for not complying, Merchant is entitled to attorneys' fees and litigation expenses totaling just over $54,000, Krause found.

Krause ordered Willis to search for and turn over all records responsive to Merchant's requests. The documents and payment are to be delivered within 30 days of Friday's order.

A spokesperson for Willis' office said Monday that they plan to appeal the order.

Merchant said she filed the lawsuit as a last resort after Willis' office repeatedly failed to produce documents.

“We definitely didn't want to file suit,� she said. “They were just ignoring it and telling us that documents didn't exist that we knew existed and resisting at every move, so we really didn't have a choice.�

Willis' office was “openly hostile� to Merchant and testimony showed that Merchant's requests “were handled differently than other requests,� Krause wrote in her order. Open records officer Dexter Bond said during a hearing that he refused to communicate by phone with Merchant, even though it was his regular practice to call the requester if a request was unclear.

Treating Merchant's requests this way “indicates a lack of good faith,� Krause wrote.

Among the records Merchant sought were reports provided to Willis' office by companies hired “to track the impact of Willis' statements to the media and whether such statements were viewed favorably by the public,� according to a court filing. The filing says Willis began contracting with those companies just before she and her office sought to indict Trump, Roman and others.

Merchant also asked for a copy of the non-disclosure or confidentiality agreement that employees of the district attorney's office are required to sign, as well as a list of attorneys Willis had hired.

The Georgia Court of Appeals that Willis and her office could not continue to prosecute the election interference case against Trump and others. Willis the Georgia Supreme Court to review and reverse that ruling, and the high court has not yet said whether it will take up the case.

The intermediate appeals court's ruling was based on an “appearance of impropriety� created by a romantic relationship Willis had with , whom she had hired to lead the case. It was a bombshell filing by Merchant in January 2024 that first exposed that relationship publicly, alleging that the relationship created a conflict of interest that should disqualify Willis and her office from the case.

A grand jury in Atlanta indicted Trump and 18 others in August 2023, using the to accuse them of participating in a wide-ranging scheme to illegally try to overturn Trump’s narrow 2020 loss to Democrat Joe Biden in Georgia. The alleged scheme included Trump’s urging him to help find enough votes to beat Biden. Four people have pleaded guilty. Trump and the others, including Roman, have pleaded not guilty.

Even if the Georgia Supreme Court agrees to hear the case and eventually rules in Willis’ favor, it seems unlikely that she will be able to prosecute Trump while he's the sitting president. But there are 14 other defendants, including Roman, who still face charges in the case.