Faith groups split over bill to protect same-sex marriage

FILE - Cardinal Timothy Dolan, archbishop of New York, speaks during a news conference, Monday, Sept. 30, 2019 in New York. In November 2022, Dolan, chairman of the Catholic bishops鈥 Committee for Religious Liberty, dismissed a bill pending in the Senate that would protect same sex and interracial marriages in federal law, as failing even the 鈥渕eager goal鈥 of preserving the status quo in balancing religious freedom with the right to same-sex marriage. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

Among U.S. faith leaders and denominations, there are sharp differences over the bill advancing in the Senate that would protect same-sex and interracial marriages in federal law.

The measure, a high priority for congressional Democrats, won a Wednesday when 12 Senate Republicans joined all Democrats to forward the bill for a final vote in the coming days. At least 10 GOP senators were needed for that to happen.

On Tuesday, one of the most prominent conservative-leaning denominations -- -- came out in favor of the legislation. But the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention remain opposed, saying the bill 鈥 even with a newly added amendment aimed at attracting Republican support 鈥 is a dire threat to religious liberty.

A paramount concern for these leaders of the country's two largest denominations is that even the updated bill would not protect religious schools or faith-based nonprofits such as adoption and foster care providers.

The bill 鈥渋s an intentional attack on the religious freedom of millions of Americans with sincerely held beliefs about marriage, based on dictates of faith in God,鈥 leaders of the Missouri Baptist Convention, an SBC affiliate, said in a letter this week to U.S. Sen. Roy Blunt, a Missouri Republican.

The letter failed to sway Blunt; he voted for the bill.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York, chairman of the Catholic bishops鈥 Committee for Religious Liberty, dismissed the bipartisan amendment as failing even the 鈥渕eager goal鈥 of preserving the status quo in balancing religious freedom with the right to same-sex marriage.

鈥淭he bill will be a new arrow in the quiver of those who wish to deny religious organizations鈥 liberty to freely exercise their religious duties, strip them of their tax exemptions, or exclude them from full participation in the public arena,鈥 Dolan said earlier this week.

Meanwhile, many left-of-center faith leaders are cheering the bill, including some who planned a Thursday morning rally at the U.S. Capitol. Rally sponsors include the Interfaith Alliance, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, the United Church of Christ Justice and Local Church Ministries and Hindus for Human Rights.

鈥淭his is common sense legislation which provides religious liberty for all and not just a few,鈥 said Tarunjit Singh Butalia, executive director of Religions for Peace USA. 鈥淔aith communities need to work on living out the principles of marriage enshrined in their own faith without imposing their religious views on people of other faiths and no faith."

The bill won approval in the House in July. A final Senate vote is expected soon, and the measure 鈥 if approved 鈥 would then return to the House for consideration of Senate changes.

The bill has gained steady momentum since the Supreme Court鈥檚 June and the federal right to abortion. An opinion at that time from Justice Clarence Thomas suggested that an protecting same-sex marriage could also come under threat.

Rachel Laser, president of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, noted the court opinions in her statement lauding Wednesday's vote. She called the legislation a 鈥渧ital step in our nation鈥檚 march toward freedom without favor and equality without exception.鈥

The legislation included a proposed Senate amendment, designed to bring more Republicans on board, clarifying that it does not affect rights of private individuals or businesses that are already enshrined in law. Another tweak would make clear that a marriage is between two people, an effort to ward off some far-right criticism that the legislation could endorse polygamy.

However, numerous conservative faith leaders scoffed at the changes.

鈥淭he new amended Senate bill鈥攖he 鈥榗ommonsense鈥 bill that 鈥榩rotects Americans鈥 religious liberties鈥欌攁ctually does no such thing,鈥 wrote the Rev. Al Mohler Jr., president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky, in an opinion piece. 鈥淲hat is left wide open is the threat to ministries such as Christian orphanages and children鈥檚 care as well as adoption ministries and foster care.鈥

The head of the Southern Baptist鈥檚 public policy arm, Brent Leatherwood of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, faulted the bill鈥檚 Senate backers for pushing legislation 鈥渢hat will only divide us.鈥

鈥淲e oppose this bill because marriage is an institution created by God, one with a very specific design: A union between one man and one woman for life,鈥 Leatherwood said via email.

Pastor Jack Hibbs who leads Calvary Chapel Chino Hills, an evangelical megachurch in Southern California, said the legislation 鈥渃reates an atmosphere of great disrespect for marriage.鈥

鈥淲e have seen this in recent years, for example, regarding businesses that provide services for weddings, from wedding venues to bakeries and florists,鈥 he said, adding that nonprofits could be sued 鈥渂ecause of their personal and foundational convictions, which should be protected by the First Amendment.鈥

San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone, chairman of the Catholic bishops' Committee on Laity, Marriage, Family Life, and Youth, said the bill provided inadequate religious protections.

鈥淚 object to language like exceptions, because it means that we鈥檙e allowed a pass to discriminate,鈥 he said in an interview Wednesday. 鈥淏ut that鈥檚 not what we鈥檙e doing at all. We鈥檙e affirming that children need a mother and a father."

He acknowledged that leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 鈥渟eem to be moving in a different direction鈥 regarding same-sex marriage. 鈥淏ut they鈥檝e been very, very strong partners with us in trying to keep the focus on the the need to preserve the family."

In its statement Tuesday, the Utah-based LDS said church doctrine would continue to consider same-sex relationships to be against God鈥檚 commandments, but that it would support rights for same-sex couples as long as they didn鈥檛 infringe upon religious groups鈥 right to believe as they choose.

Among the faith leaders urging passage of the bill was the Rev. Paul Brandeis Raushenbush, an American Baptist pastor who is president of Interfaith Alliance and is part of a same-sex marriage.

鈥漈here is a misconception that faith and LGBTQ+ equality are fundamentally incompatible,鈥 he wrote in an opinion piece carried Wednesday by Religion News Service.

鈥淎s a religious leader, I regard this historic legislation as an important contribution to America鈥檚 religious freedom,鈥 he wrote. 鈥滿ore immediately, I am not willing to leave the status of the marriages I鈥檝e performed or my own to chance.鈥

__

AP Religion Team journalists Holly Meyer, Peter Smith, Deepa Bharath and Luis Andres Henao contributed to this report.

鈥-

Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP鈥檚 collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

The 好色tv Press. All rights reserved.