ºÃÉ«tv

"If you disrupt the habit of Americans sourcing energy from Quebec and Canada, once they have found other sources of supply, you will be in a very disadvantageous position to negotiate new contracts. In the long term, it's a bit of a scorched-earth policy," he said.

Blanchet's stance aligns with that of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, who has stood out among premiers by ruling out cutting off the U.S. from her province's oil.

He also noted that the supply of energy is possibly a national security issue for Americans, adding that oil from Canada is "somewhat theirs since it is in their backyard," which makes Canada's threats even less "wise."

Trump had been threatening to impose punishing tariffs on Canada on his first day in office, but he opted instead on Monday's inauguration day to announce a plan to study alleged unfair trade practices. The president signed an executive order directing that the study be completed by April 1.

But Monday evening, as he signed that and other executive orders, Trump said he is thinking about hitting Canada and Mexico with 25 per cent tariffs on Feb. 1.

And while Blanchet supports responding to U.S. tariffs with counter-tariffs, he said ºÃÉ«tv leaders should avoid talking about "retaliation" or a "trade war," terms that Foreign Affairs Minister, Mélanie Joly used frequently last week in Washington, as did Legault on Monday evening.

"That's not how you create the conditions for proper negotiations," Blanchet said. "American negotiators won't negotiate by pounding their fists on the table. They will eventually negotiate rationally. Reason will prevail."

This report by ºÃÉ«tvwas first published Jan. 21, 2025.